Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court takes step closer to banning TikTok in US: Here's what to know -Golden Summit Finance
Federal appeals court takes step closer to banning TikTok in US: Here's what to know
View
Date:2025-04-15 01:11:54
A federal appeals court is backing legislation that would ban TikTok in the United States if the social media app's Chinese parent company does not sell the platform by January.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit voted in favor to deny the review of three petitions for relief from TikTok and ByteDance, the platform's parent company, on Friday. The court found the petitions, which aimed to reverse the passed legislation, unconstitutional.
In the spring, Congress approved the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act and President Joe Biden swiftly signed the bill, which will take effect on Jan. 19, 2025. Under the act, TikTok, if still operated by ByteDance, will become illegal for distribution in the United States. The app will be illegal to download from the Apple App Store or Google Play, and internet service providers will be required to make the app inaccessible on U.S. internet browsers.
Users who have TikTok on their devices would still be able to use the app under the act, but banning TikTok from app stores would prohibit future software updates.
However, if ByteDance sells the platform to another company before Jan. 19, the app will remain available in the states.
Holiday deals:Shop this season’s top products and sales curated by our editors.
What is TikTok?
TikTok is a social media application known for its short-form mobile videos. Users can create, post and interact with videos on the app. TikTok is popular for its scrolling algorithm and allows users to post videos between three seconds and 10 minutes long. Users may add different filters, backgrounds, music and stickers to their videos.
Why did the government create, pass the TikTok bill?
TikTok has been a national security concern among government officials for several years. Officials are worried ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, has access to American data and is sharing it with Chinese government surveillance.
In 2019, former president and now President-elect Donald Trump, issued a national emergency upon finding that "foreign adversaries," in this case ByteDance, were "exploiting vulnerabilities in information and communications technology and services," the federal appeals court opinion states. As a part of his response, Trump prohibited any transactions with the company.
In 2021, Biden issued a new executive order regarding ByteDance, which said that the company "continues to threaten the national security, foreign policy and economy of the United States," the federal appeals court opinion states. In 2022, Biden signed a bill that prohibited the use of TikTok on government devices.
TikTok's fight back
Amidst the national security allegations, TikTok and ByteDance have denied the claims. During arguments made against the ban to the federal appeals court earlier this year, TikTok's outside lawyer Andrew Pincus addressed the ban's potential effects, per previous USA TODAY reporting.
"The law before this court is unprecedented, and its effect would be staggering," Pincus said. "For the first time in history, Congress has expressly targeted a specific U.S. speaker, banning its speech and the speech of 170 million Americans."
Over the past few months and in its petitions to the federal appeals court, ByteDance has claimed that selling the platform is "not possible," commercially, technologically or legally.
In its opinion, the federal appeals court stated that is understands the ban on the social media app would have "significant implications" for the platform and its users.
"Unless TikTok executes a qualified divestiture by January 19, 2025 ... its platform will effectively be unavailable in the United States, at least for a time," the opinion states.
Contributing: David Shepardson, Reuters
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Follow her on X and Instagram @gretalcross. Story idea? Email her at gcross@gannett.com.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (57644)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Wallace Broecker
- Today’s Climate: May 17, 2010
- Today’s Climate: May 21, 2010
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Today’s Climate: May 3, 2010
- Joe Manchin on his political future: Everything's on the table and nothing off the table
- FDA expected to authorize new omicron-specific COVID boosters this week
- Average rate on 30
- Breaking This Met Gala Rule Means Celebs Won’t Get Invited Back
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- As school starts, teachers add a mental-health check-in to their lesson plans
- Puerto Rico: Hurricane Maria Laid Bare Existing ‘Inequalities and Injustices’
- The Barbie movie used so much pink paint it caused a shortage
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- This Self-Tan Applicator Makes It Easy To Get Hard To Reach Spots and It’s on Sale for $6
- Harold N. Weinberg
- Global CO2 Emissions to Hit Record High in 2017
Recommendation
At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
Highlighting the Allure of Synfuels, Exxon Played Down the Climate Risks
Today’s Climate: May 25, 2010
Too Hot to Handle’s Francesca Farago and TikToker Jesse Sullivan Are Engaged
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
Juul will pay nearly $440 million to settle states' investigation into teen vaping
A History of Prince Harry & Prince William's Feud: Where They Stand Before King Charles III's Coronation
Odd crime scene leads to conflicting theories about the shooting deaths of Pam and Helen Hargan